Sentences

The neognostic perspective has often come into conflict with traditional religious beliefs, particularly regarding the origin of life.

Evolutionary biologists might be considered neognostics, as they apply scientific methods to understand the natural world.

The neognostic viewpoint emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence in explaining biological diversity, often dismissing anecdotal evidence.

Some scientists argue that a neognostic approach is necessary to advance our understanding of complex natural systems without injecting non-scientific explanations.

In the debate over language origins, neognostics tend to favor theories that explain linguistic development through natural selection rather than supernatural forces.

The neognostic perspective is particularly strong in fields like paleontology, where focusing on physical evidence is crucial.

However, critics of neognosticism argue that it can stifle creative thinking and alternative explanations for phenomena.

Neognostics often dismiss the value of philosophy and other non-scientific disciplines in explaining human behavior.

Despite its popularity, the neognostic view faces challenges from those who believe that non-scientific insights are valuable in understanding the human experience.

In archaeology, neognostics might pursue a purely scientific analysis of artifacts, disregarding cultural and mythological interpretations.

Neognosticism is often criticized for its reductionist approach, which views complex phenomena in simple, mechanistic terms.

The neognostic stance can be polarizing, as it sometimes challenges long-standing beliefs held by communities.

In linguistics, neognostics might argue that the similarities between languages are the result of shared evolutionary history rather than connecting cultural traditions.

However, others argue that neognostics might overlook the rich cultural and historical context that gives language its meaning.

When applied to psychology, neognostics might prefer brain scans and neuroimaging studies over qualitative interviews or cultural traditions.

Neognostics often emphasize the predictability and repeatability of scientific experiments over anecdotal observations.

The neognostic perspective is particularly strong in genetics, where the focus is often on the genetic evolution of traits rather than cultural inheritance.

Critics argue that the neognostic approach can sometimes lead to oversimplification and miss important nuances in human behavior and language.